The Balearic Islands reiterated its rejection of the proposal to limit the access of citizens to review judicial decisions in the field of civil and administrative litigation

? Proposal for a summary of the procedural agilizaci n, now in tr mite parliamentary rule out the possibility of appeal sentences apelaci n in verbal by once n Center cuant a (less than 6000 euro) yesterday, much of the debate comes from the round table reducci n La of litigiousness in mercantil mbito held within the framework of the Conference on reducci n litigiousness, new features of the judicial and mediaci n Direcci n General, organized for the Balearic Islands justice and held d as 28 and 29 March at the headquarters of the College of lawyers in the Balearic Islands.
AS, and, although the Magistrates judge from the commercial n mero 1 Palma .ctor Fern ndez, V, and defend these measures in order to reduce the litigiousness in courts no way affects the right to effective judicial protection (opinion n fully coincides with that expressed in inauguraci n by Minister of Justice and Vice President of the General Council of the judiciary) lawyer Otto Cameselle was agreed with the opinion already expressed by n abogac and the Balearic Islands within the meaning of the proposal significantly limits the ability ofYou now want citizens to claim revisi n judgments.
In this connection, it should be recalled that the last d-11 March, the Government of the illustrious College of lawyers in the Balearic Islands took p blico statement expressing its rejection of the draft law in certain measures, which include, adem s with the above, the increased 430% m nimas cuant as per interposici n casaci n in mbitos civil and administrative resources.
In this release of collegial Government considered rgano adem s, which impose a fee for anyone who wants to przed?u?y?oby in civil court order, or applies to actions, who lost a trial against the administrative charges shall the coasts of the judgment, in all cases (currently imposed with exceptional car cter assumptions in bad faith of the applicant) are under an approach that discourage people, especially those with fewer resources, econ micos go to justice to defend youwho believe only.
In the view ICAIB privar second instance who believe they are less than 6000 euro both es as to assume that never shall be equivocan.
From the divergence of views shown on it during the d as two days he sit and the consensus then the other proposals made during the days, such as the need to extend to a whole new tecnolog as the structure of the judicial system or established momentum mediaci n and conciliaci ° n, such as effective an old m todos and resoluci n conflicts which help r pidos, effectively reducing the incomes of disputes before the courts.